Can nonlinear models improve residential price prediction?
I compared linear and tree-based approaches to understand whether nonlinear relationships produced a meaningful reduction in prediction error.
A comparative modeling project focused not only on predictive performance, but also on residual behavior, fairness risk, and whether the result was ready for real-world use.
I compared linear and tree-based approaches to understand whether nonlinear relationships produced a meaningful reduction in prediction error.
I prepared the data, explored feature relationships, trained competing models, evaluated cross-validation results, reviewed residuals, and translated the findings into production-risk recommendations.
Used linear regression to establish an interpretable benchmark and reveal where simple assumptions were insufficient.
Evaluated Random Forest and Gradient Boosting to capture interactions and nonlinear patterns.
Reviewed RMSE, MAE, R², residual patterns, high-value property errors, and possible location-proxy concerns.
The model captured meaningful signal and outperformed the simpler baseline, but the error remained too high for high-stakes appraisal use without stronger location features, market-specific validation, fairness review, and ongoing monitoring.